Civil Revision

DISTRICT : DHAKA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

CIVIL REVISION NO. OF _________

IN THE MATTER OF:

X

PETITIONER

Versus

Z and others

OPPOSITE-PARTIES

SUPPLEMENTERY AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER

I, X son of _______________________ of __________________________, aged about _______ years, by faith Muslim, by nationality Bangladeshi, by profession businessman, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as follows:

1. That I am the petitioner in this revisional petition and acquainted with the facts and circumstances and competent to swear this Affidavit.

2. That due to annual vacation of the District Court, while submitting the revisional petition I could not enclose with the petition the original certified copy of the Order (No. 11) dated 04.06.97 passed by Mr. Golum Ahmed Khalilur Rahman, 1st Assistant Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 245 of 1996 allowing the application filed by the opposite-party No.1 on 13.10.96 for temporary injunction to restrain the petitioner from working as the Managing Director of Chuadanga Flour Mills Limited, a private Company limited by shares incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913 and restraining the opposite-party No.2 from passing the resolution dated 20.04.96 adopted by the Board of Directors of the said Company. But I submitted a photocopy of the said certified copy. Now the original certified copy of the said order is enclosed herewith as directed by the Hon’ble Court.

3. That this supplementary affidavit may please be treated as part of the revisional petition and the lapse may please be regretted.

4. That the statements made hereinabove are true to the best of my knowledge which I verily believe to be true.

Prepared in my office : DEPONENT
________________________

Advocate

 The deponent is known to

me and identified by me.
Solemnly affirmed before me by the aforesaid deponent on this the __th day of __________________. ADVOCATE
Commissioner of Affidavits

Supreme Court of Bangladesh,

High Court Division

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.