Legal Opinion for settlement of ACU$ 3,52,250.00 debitted by Bank 1, Kolkata in compliance with the order of Kolkata High Court, A/C Company 1.

12. Nov, 2010

Mr. Z

Address….

Dear Sir,

RE: Legal Opinion for settlement of ACU$ 3,52,250.00 debitted by Bank 1, Kolkata in compliance with the order of Kolkata High Court, A/C Company 1.

We refer to your letter dated December 26, 2007 and February 11, 2008 and our letter dated January 08, 2008 on the above subject.

From perusal of your letter and the provided documents it appears that, Company 1, through Bank 2 (“BANK 2”) opened a Letter of Credit (“L/C”) in favour of M/S COMPANY 1 (L/C Beneficiary). Bank of India was the bank of the L/C Beneficiary and Bank 1 (“Bank 1”) was the advising Bank. Dispute arose regarding payment under the L/C and the L/C Beneficiary took the matter to the court in India. On 6 November 2006, the High Court at Calcutta in G.A. No. 2921 of 2006, Apot No. 472 of 2006. C.S. No. 678 of 1999 passed a decree for US$ 3,52,250.00 against BANK 2 in favour of Bank of India to be credited by Bank of India to the account of the L/C Beneficiary and also directed that the decree shall be satisfied from the funds lying with Bank 1.

In accordance with the said decree of the High Court at Calcutta, Bank 1 remitted US$ 3,52,250.00 to Bank of India by debiting the ACU$ A/C of BANK 2 maintained with Bank 1. The amount was blocked since 22 December 1999 at BANK 2’s Nostro A/C with Bank 1 vide an order of injunction passed by the High Court at Calcutta. But vide the said decree dated 6 November 2006 of the High Court at Calcutta, upon such payment, the injunction order was vacated.

Company 1 has Tk. 69,80,888.68 in 4 (four) un-encumbered A/Cs (“Un-encumbered A/Cs”) and Tk. 45,88,047.00 in 1 (one) encumbered A/C (“Encumbered A/C”) lying with the Khatungonj Branch, Chittagong of BANK 2.

In the circumstances stated above, you require our legal opinion on the following issues:

Query 1. Whether the Khatungonj Branch of BANK 2 should respond to the remitted amount of US$ 3,52,250.00 by Bank 1 from A/C of BANK 2 maintained with Bank 1 by debiting the amount from the accounts of Company 1 maintained with the Khatungonj Branch?

Response: A bank has a right under law to set off a debt owing to a customer against a debt due from the Bank. Therefore, BANK 2 may debit amounts from the accounts of Company 1 maintained with the Khatungonj Branch in order to set off the US$ 3,52,250.00 remitted by Bank 1 from A/C of BANK 2 maintained with Bank 1.

Query 2. If so then which head of account should be debited?

Response: BANK 2 may set off the said amount from the 4 (four) Un-encumbered A/Cs of of Company 1 maintained with the Khatungonj Branch. And provided that, the Encumbered Account is encumbered against the L/C in question, then BANK 2 may also set off from this Encumbered Account. However, if the Encumbered Account is encumbered against a separate L/C then BANK 2 should refrain from setting off from the Encumbered Account as it will compromise the security taken for the said separate L/C.

Query 3. After adjusting part of the amount from the accounts of Company 1 maintained with the Khatungonj Branch, whether BANK 2 may create forced loan account for the remaining amount?

Response: After setting off, we are of the opinion that, BANK 2 may create forced loan account for the remaining amount against the name of Company 1 to protect the interest of BANK 2.

If you have any further query, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,

………………….

For: “The Lawyers & Jurists”

You are here: Legal Opinion Legal Opinion for settlement of ACU$ 3,52,250.00 debitted by Bank 1, Kolkata in compliance with the order of Kolkata High Court, A/C Company 1.

Disclaimer: The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist. The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site. -- If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Back to Top

WordPress Themes