Enemy Property (Lands and Buildings) Administration and Disposal Order, 1966

 

Enemy
Property (Lands and Buildings) Administration and Disposal Order, 1966


Section 4–

Under this
section the lessee was not entitled to hold over after expiry of the period
oflease.

Farid Miah
vs Kutub uddin 46 DLR (AD) 183.

 

Section 5–

The
petitioner having furnished sufficient documents to establish his prima facie
title, even if his title is invalid or bad in law it would be a matter to be
decided by the civil Court. It is for the authority to go to the civil Court
and to get a decision as to title and find whether the petitioner could be
evicted by means of notice under section 5 of the Order.

Aftab uddin
Ahmed vs Bangladesh 46 DLR 59.

 

Articles 4 & 5–

The
Government has no right to oust a co–owner in possession of the disputed
property without bringing a suit for partition to separate the enemy portion
thereof.

Zillul Haq
and others vs Maloti Bala Dey & ors 50DLR 367.

 

Paragraph 5–

After the
repeal of Vested and Non–Resident Property Ordinance vide Ordinance No.92 of
1976 there was no scope for starting any VP case under the provisions of the
aforesaid law afresh and if any proceeding is started for treating a property
as vested property, under the law that will be absolutely without jurisdiction.

Additional
Deputy Commissioenr (Revenue) vs Md Mostafa Ali Mridha and others 48 DLR
193.

 

Enemy Property (Lands And Buildings) Administration And Disposal Order, 1966

 

Enemy
Property (Lands And Buildings) Administration And Disposal Order, 1966


Section—4

Under
Section 4 of the aforesaid order, the lessee is not entitled to hold over after
the expiry of the period of lease.

Farid Miah
Vs. Kutubuddin being dead, his hears: Shanu Begum and others, 14 BLD (AD) 26.

 

ENEMY PROPERTY (LANDS AND BUILDINGS) ADMINISTRATION AND DISPOSAL ORDER, 1966

 

ENEMY PROPERTY (LANDS AND BUILDINGS)
ADMINISTRATION AND DISPOSAL ORDER, 1966

 

Section–4(3)(4)

 

Release—When the
Custodian. Enemy Property released the property on the ground that the same is
not Enemy Property he could not direct the tenant to handover the property to a
person whose title is denied by the owner.

Mst. Aflabunessa Vs. Md. Shamsul I-faq Taiukder, 4BLI)(AD)273

Ref: A.I.R 1919(PC)44—Cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.