Recognized Non-Government Secondary Schools

 

Recognized
Non-Government Secondary Schools Regulation, 1977


Whether an
executive committee after being elected has to be approved by the Board- Learned
appellate court below allowed the prayer for temporary and mandatory injunction
on the ground that the Managing Committee which was elected in 1995 is not a
valid committee in as much as the said committee has not been approved by the
Board—There is no such provision in the regulation which requires that an
executive committee after being elected has to be approved by the Board.
[Para-8]

Dr Habibur Rahman MR & Ors Vs. Most. Shamsun Naher 6 BLT
(HCD)- 13

 

The
Recognized Non-Government Secondary School Teachers (Board of Intermediate and
Secondary Education, Dhaka) Terms and Conditions of Service Regulations, 1979

 

Regulations-26& 27 (2)

Inspector of
Schools, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Dhaka, purporting to
extend the petitioner’s service for two years as the Headmaster of Hammadia
High School, Dhaka, with effect from 1-9-95— Held : Only the Managing Committee
of the school as the appointing authority of the petitioner could legally
permit him to continue as the Headmaster of the aforesaid school till the end
of 1995 as he had attained the age of super annexation on 30.8.95. But
unfortunately, the petitioner did get any such permission. Thus petitioner’s
continuation in service as the Headmaster of the said school after 30.8.95 was
also not covered by the aforesaid Regulation 26.

Besides, the
petitioner’s prayer for extension of service having not been recommended by the
Managing Committee, under Regulation 27(2) aforementioned, the Board has no
legal authority to grant extension of his service under the authority
contemplated therein. IParas-lO & 11]

Md. Fazlur Rahman Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh & Ors. 5 BLT
(AD)-148

 

Recognized
Non-Government Secondary School Teachers (Board of Intermediate of Secondary
Education, Dhaka) Terms and Conditions of Service Regulations, 1979

 

Regulation-14

Plaintiff-Headmaster
suspended for misappropriation—a three member enquiry committee with a chairman
constituted—written question provided and answered—plaintiff dismissed without
a 2nd show cause notice—no scope of principles of equity and justice —
dismissal order held legal.

The
plaintiff had the full opportunity to examine the papers and place his case. He
did not ask for any personal hearing nor did he ask for examination of any
witness or production of any document. The enquiry report, on the basis of
papers and the plaintiffs answer to the committee quires, was endorsed by all
the three members. The order of dismissal, based on that report, was approved
by the Board, Such approval was not challenged at the appellate stage.

Post Office High School Vs. Asgar Ali & Ors. 3 BLT (AD)-92.

 

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.