Jananirapata (Bishesh Bidhan) Ain, 2000

 

 

Jananirapata (Bishesh Bidhan) Ain, 2000

Section-10 & 12

Bail—provision for speedy trial had been made in the Ain of 2000 and speedy trial is also a right of the accused person and in the event of delay in trial accused persons may legally justified in asking for bail and used person cannot be detained in jail for indefinite period.

Reaz Shahid Vs The State 9 BLT (HCD)-418

Section-16

Having considers the vagueness of the prosecution case of the statements of 2 witnesses namely Md. Shahidullah and Md. Saha Alam made under Section 14 of the Jananirapatta (Bishesh Bishan) Ain, 2000 and the mysterious droping of accused Jalal and Lahauddin from the charge sheet, we are inclined to grant bail to the appellant.

Bhashani @ Shirajuddin Vs. The State 8 BLT (HCD)-350

Judicial Mind—For passing an order of detention

Grounds of detention are " ???? ????? ????? ?? ???????? ???? ????? ???? ???????? ????, ????, ????? ??? ? ????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ??????? ??? ???????????? ??? ???????? ????????, ???? ???????? ???????????? ?????, ???? ????? ?????? ?????????? ? ?????????? ????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ? ??????????????? ????? ???, ???? ? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????????, ????? ???? ?????? ? ???? ? ?? ??????-?? ??????? ??????????????? ?????? ????? ???????? ??????????? (???-? ?????) ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ?? ????/???? ?????? ????????? ??????? ?????? ????? ???????? ????????“—Admittedly no case has been filed against the detenu for publication of any parody therefore the allegation made in the grounds of parody therefore the allegation made in the grounds of detention is a lack of application of mind. The Police having failed to arrest the accused persons of the said criminal case filed by the Government on 13.11.2000 arrested the detenu who happens to be the brother of an accused, such actions if nothing but an example of extreme highhandedness which must be avoided.

Aafrin Moinuddin Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh 9 BLT (HCD)-3

Judicial Mind in respect of Judicial Proceedings

The court should be unduly sensitive or touchy about its dignity. A mere audible remark or conduct, not meant for the court, should not be taken as an interference of interruption in Court's work while sitting at any stage of judicial proceedings. A certain degree of tolerance is always expected of a judicial officer.

Md. Moshiur Rahman Vs. The State 8 BLT (HCD)-209.

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.