CHITTAGONG PORT (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE (XXIV
and Rule 122
for Port Authority—When it can claim exemption—Unless it could be shown that the
appellant applied to the Port Authority for storing goods and after obtaining
its permission entered into an open storage agreement, the exemption cannot be
claimed—The appellant did not have any iota of knowledge regarding either the
storage or the number of cement bags claimed to have been stored by the Port
Authority—Claim to exemption from liability is dependent on the fulfillment of
certain conditions of Rule 122— There was no fulfillment of those conditions.
Railway Vs. M/s. Sinfracht Chartering and Ship-braking Corporation through
their local agents, United Liner Agencies and others; 5 BLD (AD) 115.