CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1926, CASES, PART 3

Contempt of Courts Act, 1926

Section 2 – Punishment for disobedience to courts order

When the appellants by showing disregard to the directions of the Company Court did not hold or cooperate to hold the A.C.M of the company on unfounded pretext and continued the defiant attitude without seeking any apology or expressing any remorse, the penalty of fine imposed by the High Court Division has been held by the apex court to be perfectly justified.

Hamidul Haque another Vs. Akhtaruzzaman, 11 MLR (2006) (AD) 32.

Contempt of Courts Act, 1926

Section 2 – Acceptance of apology in appeal by the Appellate Division

When the appellant condemners admitted their guilt of disobedience to the court order and tendered unconditional apology, the Appellate Division accepted the apology and in consideration of the apology and the confusing nature of the order, set aside the order of conviction and Sentence for contempt of court.

Abul Kalam Azad and others Vs. Mohammad Iqbal Hossain and others 13 MLR (2008) 205.

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.