FAMILY COURTS ORDINANCE, 1985

 

FAMILY COURTS ORDINANCE, 1985

 

Section—6(1)

Place of institution of
suit—Within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the parties reside or
last resided together —Parties where reside or last resided together—can be
gone into at the time of trial of the suit if a proper issue is raised on the
point.

Abdul Matlib Gaznvi Vs.Toiyab Ali and others, 12 BLD (AD) 30 –

 

Section—17(1)

Appeal—Under
section 17(l) of the Family Courts Ordinance there is no scope for any
confusion that an appeal shall lie from a judgment, decree or order of a Family
Court to the Court of the District Judge’. The Court of the District Judge
being a civil Court, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure would apply
to the proceedings before the Court of the District Judge.

Md. Moinuddin Vs. Anna Khan Majlish, 10BLD (HCD) 404

Ref: 38 DLR (AD) I 72;—Cited.FOREST ACT, 1927(XVI OF 1927)

 

Section—20

Abatement of a legal
proceeding challenging validity of the notifications constituting reserved
forest known as Attia Forest—There is no scope for challenging the validity
of notification of 1972 under the Forest Act (XVI of 1972) constituting
reserved forest after the promulgation of the Attia Forest (Protection)
Ordinance (XXXIII of 1982)- All judgments, decrees or orders in respect of
Attia Forest shall have no force and all suits, appeals and other legal
proceedings chal— lenging constitution of Attia Reserved Forest shall
abate-Independently of the Attia Forest (Protection) Ordinance, the
Notification of 1972 constituting reserved forest known as Attia Forest is
valid.

Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Baset Mia, 6 BLD (AD) 62.

 

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.