Martial Law Regulation No. 1 of 1982

 

MARTIAL LAW
REGULATION NO. 1 OF 1982

 

Regulation—3(3)
and 3(5)

A
study of Regulation 3(3) and 3(5) will show that immediately after the
termination of all proceedings before a Summary Martial Law Court (SMLC) the
proceeding should be submitted to the relevant authority for review. in
regulation 3 there is no provision enabling the aggrieved party himself to file
a review application against the judgment and order passed by a SMLC. The
mandatory provision is that after termination of the proceeding the record
should be submitted for review to the competent authority.

In
the present case after termination of SMLC No. 51 of 1982 it was not submitted
before the competent authority for review. In the absence of such assertion
this Court is not inclined to believe that the said judgment was not eventually
submitted for review as contemplated under Regulation No. 3 of M.L.R. 1 of 1982
and was not disposed of in due course. The law does not provide for further
review at the instance of an aggrieved party and as such there is no reason to
assume that a review petition is in fact pending before any authority for which
a forum is required to be created.

Mr. Abdul Hakim
Vs Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 17 BLD (HCD) 317.

Ref:
42 DLR 1; 42 DLR (AD) 241; 13 BLD (1993)(AD) 17;—Cited.

 

Martial Law Regulation No. 1 of 1982


Martial Law Regulation No. 1 of 1982


Regulation 3(4)—

When the reviewing authority acted in excess of his power
conferred under regulation 3(4) of the Martial Law Regulation No. 1 of 1982 the
impugned order passed in reviewing by the CMLA converting the judgment of
acquittal into one of conviction is without any lawful authority.

Abdur Rahman vs Bangladesh 49 DLR 344.

 

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.