We have already found that the mark of the objector-respondent was not in well -known use in this country. For attracting Article 6 of the Paris Convention there must be proof of well-known or wide use which is very much lacking in the case of the objector. Furthermore, the objector has not got his mark registered in this country. So he now cannot claim any protection under Article 6 of the Convention. Our law has not given him any right to pray for such protection. Para-10
Samah Razor Blades Industries Ltd. Vs. M/S. Supermax International Pvt. Ltd. 7 BLT (HCD)-70.