Petition of Wife for Annulment of Void Marriage by Shiva.

Petition of Wife for Annulment of Void Marriage

IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Matrimonial Petition No. . . . . . . . . . . . of 20 . . . . .

Smt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                          Petitioner;

Versus

1.?Shri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.?Smt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         ??Respondents.

The petitioner, abovenamed, states as follows :

1. The petitioner and Respondent No. 1 were married on . . . . . at . . . . . . . . and the parties were and are Hindus.

2. After the aforesaid marriage, the petitioner and the respondent lived as man and wife at the house of Respondent No. 1 at . . . . . . . . . . until . . . . . . . .

3. On . . . . . . . . . or thereabout, the father of Respondent No. 2, Shri . . . . . . . . . . . came to the petitioner’s matrimonial home and claimed that his daughter, Respondent No. 2, was married to Respondent No. 1 and he refused or neglected to live with her.

4. Alarmed by the disclosure the petitioner asked her brother to investigate if the claim of Respondent No. 2 was in fact true. On investigation she learnt from her brother, Shri . . . . . . . . . . ., that the claim of Respondent No. 2 that she was married to Respondent No. 1 about 10 years back is correct.

5. On or about the . . . . . . . . . . ., the petitioner asked Respondent No. 1 about his marriage with Respondent No. 2 but his answers were evasive verging on defiance. Dissatisfied with the answers of Respondent No. 1’s marriage with Respondent No. 2 and believing the information given by her brother the petitioner left her matrimonial home on. . . . . . . . . . .and she has been living with her parents.

6. As the marriage was solemnized at . . . . . . . . . . ., this Court has jurisdiction to entertain this petition.

The petitioner, therefore, prays :

(a)   the petitioner’s marriage with the respondent be declared null and void;

(b)   the petitioner be awarded permanent alimony :

(c)   such other relief as the circumstances of the case justify.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Petitioner.

I, . . . . . . . . . . . petitioner abovenamed, do hereby declare that the contents of Paras 1 to 6 are true to my knowledge.

Verified at . . . . . . . . . . . on the date after my signature.

Dated. . . . . . . . . . .                                                      Petitioner.

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.