Police officer (Special Provisions) Ordinance, 1976 (As Amendment)
respondent was sub-Inspector of Police who was placed under suspension and on
7.6.94 charge was framed against him by the Additional Inspector General of
Police Ultimately by impugned order dated 7.7.94 the Additional Inspector
General of Police compulsorily retired him from service-In the instant case it
is the Appellate Authority which had drawn up the proceeding against the
present respondent and imposed the penalty of compulsory retirement upon him-
Held: we are in agreement with the view of the Appellate Administrative Tribunal
which held that the order of penalty imposed upon the respondent was not
sustainable in law and that the tribunal had correctly held that the proceeding
against the respondent was without jurisdiction.
Govt. of Bangladesh
& Ors Vs. Sayed Shafiqul Islam 12 BLT (AD) 130.