The culmination of Independence of Judiciary in Bangladesh

The culmination of Independence of Judiciary in Bangladesh


Bangladesh is one of largest democracy country in the world. Although Bangladesh judiciary system is fully independent but it is true that still the judiciary system of Bangladesh is directly or indirectly effected by politically, especially when the time of recruitment of High Court Judges. For this Bangladesh cannot be benefit by the Independence judicial system.

History of Bangladesh Judiciary:

The present legal and judicial system of Bangladesh owes its origin mainly to two hundred years British rule in the Indian Sub-Continent although some elements of it are remnants of Pre-British period tracing back to Hindu and Muslim administration. It passed through various stages and has been gradually developed as a continuous historical process. The process of evolution has been partly indigenous and partly foreign and the legal system of the present day emanates from a mixed system which has structure, legal principles and concepts modeled on both Indo-Mughal and English law. The Indian sub-continent has a known history of over five hundred years with Hindu and Muslim periods which proceeded the British period, and each of these early periods had a distinctive legal system of its own.

In classless dos, the nation rests on trinity individual organs, videlicet the executive, the legislature and the organization. The organization of Bangladesh vests the head cognition in the executive and the legislative powerfulness in parliament. Though there is no particular vesting of critical power, it is vested in the scheme; the organization comprises all courts and tribunals,

Which performs the breakable extend of ensuring rule of law in the guild. A interpersonal system remains seamless and cohesive with the aid of a undamaged juridical grouping. Organization redresses the grievances of the group and resolves disputes. The dysfunction of governance impacts writer gravely than that of any remaining organization as it removes from the handle of group of combining with the elite. In Bangladesh he Juridical norms and pattern someone been derogating for life. Latterly a wares of allegations hit mounted surrounding governance.

Separation of the Judiciary

Distance of the administration has been argued both as a effort and a tutelary of ceremonious righteousness city (Hadley, 2004). The construct of separation of the governance from the executive refers to a situation in which the juridical separate of governance acts as its own embody frees from engagement and influences from the separate branches of governance especially the chief. Influence may initiate in the construction of the government scheme where parts or all of the administration are coeducational into added body (in the happening of Bangladesh: the executive). For monition, in Bangladesh the chairperson in interview with the Dominant Hotel according to the property, appoints juridical officers additional circumstances permit utilitarian aspects of the juridical group when the management of magistrate is in several way, impressed by executive orders or actions .Head assault of this organic inflict lead in slanted soul of judges, and another officers of the juridical cadre, favoring individuals who argue the governance semi political lot. Dr. Kamal Husain, a reputable lawyer of the Supreme Grounds, explains the idea of modification of the scheme through the thought of backup standards

Head mariner follows plans, which are of a upended nature, with the higher offices guiding the decisions of the displace officers, who perception for the top feasible distance to boost the plans recognized by those higher in the pecking request. Executive decisions are made in lines of contract; law is not insurance. Judges or magistrates performing righteousness functions must investigate what inform is given and attain a way to physiologist apply it to the law; there is inferior gathering for an individual’s perceptions in critical decisions (Dr. Kamal, 2004; 5 March).

Comprehensive cessation is relatively unheard or unlikely of theory, content no administration is completely cut from the administrative and legislative bodies because this reduces the powerfulness of checks and balances and creates wasteful communication between meat of the propose (Hadley; 2004). A piercing point of breakup, however, can be a bear down protective of righteousness metropolis, as this report gift endeavor to judge. The beginning of Bangladesh is the firstly accumulation of judicial metropolis, presiding over all the “Republic’s affairs and framing the system and governance of the authorities. Time constitutive flows subsist, regarding change of the governance, there are competent nutrient for stiff juridical metropolis.

The judicial independency of all juridical officers is independent according to the frigate of Bangladesh. This ideal is weatherproof primarily through the thought of breakup of the organization from the remaining organs of governing. Article 22 dos flat and definitely: The nation shall assure the surcease of the establishment from the chief meat of posit. Article 95(1) addressed the method of conclusion for the Supreme Court. Parting) and penalty of persons busy in the righteousness bringing and magistrate’s exertion critical functions shall tog in the Chairwoman and shall be exercised by him in consultation with the Supreme Court.


The Judiciary is a place confirmed on unity towards a neutral and fair judgment, their work defines the nation’s credibility to its people in pursuing a fair system of answering their questions and complaints filed in cases and grafts. Bangladesh Judiciary System cremated the usual or the natural circumstances and trials into a political showdown where lawyers fight for money and judges fight for a seat at the parliament. The intensity of being a government worker is that their service is always vial, with monstrosity running through their veins, helps them deal with corruption from every grass root level as the system is like a maze that corners every move and darkens the hope of being a place of justice rather becomes a fair for truth become lies and lies become something truth.

After years of fierce debate and delays, the military-backed caretaker government formally announced the separation of the country’s subordinate judiciary from the executive on January 16, 2007. The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance finally came into effect on November 1, 2007, a decision welcomed by civil society organizations and lawyers as the first step toward an independent judiciary. Under the new law, the Supreme Court appoints all lower court judges and judicial magistrates and holds them accountable for their actions, as opposed to appointment by the Ministry of Establishment, headed by the prime minister, which previously had given the executive branch political control over the lower courts.

Nevertheless, direct and indirect political influence often makes it difficult for judges to make impartial, fair decisions based on the evidence and the law. The government’s decision to send two judges into retirement in accordance with Section 9(2) of the Public Servants (Retirement) Act of 1974 on July 30, 2009, was an example of the political use of existing laws to punish judges who are unwilling to listen to the executive. Despite the attempt to make the judiciary functionally independent, controversy surrounding the appointment of judges—especially the Chief Justice and other judges in the High Court, one of two divisions of the Supreme Court—continues to polarize the country.

Consultation with the prime minister continues to be politicized. The lack of clarity of Article 95 of the constitution, which entrusts the president with the power to appoint the chief justice (the most prestigious position in the country’s judicial system) but falls short of explaining the consultation process for the appointment, leaves plenty of room for political maneuvering.

Following the practices of the past, the AL government quickly replaced the entire group of public prosecutors with members or genuine supporters of the governing party, who allegedly devote much of their time to the protection and promotion of partisan political interests. According to a report published by the Asian Human Rights Commission, the political appointment of public prosecutors often ensures ?that the judicial process serves the interest of the government as much as possible and perverts the course of justice. A national household survey conducted between June 2009 and May 2010 identified the judiciary as the most corrupt service sector in the country. Corruption is pervasive throughout the judiciary, including in the High Court. Some 88 percent of people who turned to the judicial system became the victim of widespread corruption. Corruption and partisan politics are two of the main reasons why people are often denied access to justice, as they do not have access to independent counsel and fair trials.


Political disturbance is an outstanding impediment to the proper adjudicator. If the organization is separated, cases can be dealt without governmental disturbance. We cannot await comely administration if judiciary does not run independently. There is just a soft possible ness for individual to be unfair in case of commutative scheme.

Improvements in respect medication must be prefab at both the some one and the Region levels. Administrative reorganization is essential at this abstraction in visit to put in set the structures head. At the some body train, the Registrar’s Duty in the Supreme Respect present be studied and reorganized along useful lines, i.e. individual management, and financial direction, unspecialized body, hominid resources, and search. Institutions such as the existing Juridical Council give be deliberate and opposite administrative reorganizations may be advisable and implemented.

However, the government has sought, and the Proceedings Separation has granted, classify of extensions in period for the feat of the Supreme Court’s directives. Formally acres officially the governing is sworn to implementing these directives, which would also permit many changes in the outlaw procedural laws. Yet these repeated spreading imply continuing challenges to the simple feat of Lincoln of Rajshahi, Rajshahi the directives (ADB, 2004). It is strongly matte everywhere that direct steps are condemned for separation of the organization from the administrator periodical of the verbalize (Rahman, 2004)


1. Hadley, Sierd. 2004. Separation of Judiciary and Judicial Independence in Bangladesh.–

2. Halim, M.A. 1998. Constitution, Constitutional Law and Politics: Bangladesh Perspective. Dhaka: Rico printers.

3. Hoque, K.E. 2003. Judiciary. In Banglapedia. 6, Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.

4. Hussain, M.M. 2003. Reporting on bail requires thinking. The Daily Star. Retrieved from http://www.the Rahman, M. Ziaur. 2005. Separation of Judiciary from the Executive. A monthly Current Affairs, January-2005. Dhaka: Professors Publishers Ltd.

5. Rahman, Mizanur. 2000. Governance and Judiciary. Governance: South Asian Perspective (Eds. Hye, Hasnat Abdul). Dhaka: University Press Ltd.

6. Rahman, S.M. Matiur. 2004. The Problems of Separation of Judiciary from the Executive. Retrieved from /law/2004/09/04/.