LEGAL OPINION ON DEED OF AGREEMENT AND IRREVOCABLE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY A/C. Mr. X.

Mr. Z

Address….

Dear Sir,

RE:    LEGAL OPINION ON DEED OF AGREEMENT AND IRREVOCABLE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY A/C. Mr. X.

We refer to your letter dated 15.11.2005 on the above subject.

We have perused the draft Deed of Agreement and Irrevocable General Power of Attorney referred to us. Your queries have been dealt below.

a)         What penalty clause needs to be in the agreement so that the building is constructed and what happens if the apartment is not built?

Under the   terms of the existing draft agreement, for the period beyond 48 months the land owners shall only be entitled to rent.   Under the existing terms of the agreement, no penalty can be claimed in addition to the rent.  However, it is commercial issue for the landowners to be decided.

Now the question remains what happens if the project is not built within the prescribed period.  Broadly speaking, if the project shall not be completed within time, the landowners shall have two options, either to accept the delay or to terminate the contract.

In this instance, by virtue of clause No.11 (a) the construction period of the project has been sated 48 (forty eight) months from the date of starting the construction work with a grace period of 6 (six) months thereafter. But no indication has been given when the construction shall commence. In such a situation while the commencement date is indefinite, the project completion date has also become indefinite. There should be a specific stipulation as to the same.

Further, in accordance with clause No. 12 (c) the developer shall be entitled to continue the construction beyond the above period by paying rent to the landowner, which may give an indication that the landowners have accepted any delayed construction.

In the premises, the landowners should consider first whether to set a definite period of construction or not. If the landowners shall decide to set a definite period then in the event of breach by the developer, landowners may have a option to terminate the contract. After such termination, should the landowners intend to retain any amount paid by the developer, there should be incorporated a specific provision  to that effect.

b)         AMFL is not authorised to mortgage the said land to any financial institutions for the purpose of Bank borrowing in building the apartments. Prior clause needs to be in the agreement.

This is a commercial issue. There is no legal bar in imposing such restrictions upon the developer. But a practical problem may arise, in that, without mortgaging the project land, the developers may not raise fund from any Bank/Financial Institutions to complete the project.

However, as the landowners so intend, we are of the view   a clause may be incorporated in the agreement in following terms:

‘That the FIRST PARTY/BUILDER COMPANY shall not create any charge, mortgage of the ‘schedule A’ property or any portion thereof with any schedule bank, financial institution or any other  person or organisation  with a view to  obtain any loan or any sort of financial gain.”

c)         The ratio between the AMFL and the Landowner is 60:40. Should it be based on constructed space and the apartment numbers?

Our answer is yes.  Basically, apart from the common space, the landowners and developers share the ownership in all other spaces in a project.

The schedule of the draft agreement is vague and we therefore suggest   to incorporate the following in the agreement:

i)              Total numbers of the apartments to be built in the project.

ii)             Which 32 apartments  shall be owned by the landowners, their flat  number(s), occupying on which floor  and of what measurement.

iii)            Total numbers of car parking to be created on the ground floor.

d)         Is there any other  issue the Landowners should consider?

The following changes should be brought  in the Deed of Agreement :

i.)                  In Clause  3  – “after getting written approval from the SECOND PARTY/LAND OWNERS” should be incorporated after ‘property and’ in the 4th line

ii.)                 In Clause  5 –   From the 1st line ‘of any size’ to be  deleted.

iii.)               In Clause 16 – In the 2nd line   the phrase ‘attested photocopies of the’ should be incorporated after the word ‘necessary’.

iv.)                Clause No. 24  be deleted .

The following changes should be brought  in the IGPA:

i.)                  In  the 2nd para of the 3rd page the date of the execution of the Deed of Agreement to be inserted.

ii.)                 Paragraph No. 14  – It is advised  to  insert “ Subject to obtaining written approval from the SECOND PARTY/LAND OWNERS”  at the beginning of this  paragraph.

iii.)               Paragraph 18  should be deleted.

Should you have any further query do not hesitate to contact to us.

Yours faithfully,

………………….

For: “The Lawyers & Jurists”

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.