in the matter of the handwriting expert read with section 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat

IN THE COURT OF 1ST ARTHA RIN COURT, DHAKA

ARTHA RIN MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. ______/_______

          IN THE MATTER OF:

X

…Petitioner

-Versus-

Janata Bank

 …opposite party

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

   An application under Section 47 of the    Evidence Act, 1872 for the handwriting   expert read with section 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003

The petitioner most respectfully-

SHEWETH:

  1. That the petitioner of the instant Mis. Case could not contest in the Artha Rin Suit No. 528/2004 filed on 31.03.2004 because of the fraudulent activities of the opposite party.
  1. That the opposite party in collusion with other interested party fraudulently submitted a vokalatnama being dated 03.10.2004 on behalf of the petitioner which was neither signed by the petitioner nor authorized by the petitioner.
  1. That the opposite party forged the signature of the petitioner and submitted such forged vokalatnama with the intention to defraud the petitioner and deprived him to contest the said Artha Rin suit.
  1.  That in order to determine whether the hand-writing of the said vokalatnama was forged, it is necessary to scrutiny the forged signature by a hand-writing expert.

Therefore, it is humbly prayed to the learned Court that your honour would graciously be pleased to issue an order to determine the genuineness of the signature in the said vokalatnama for the ends of justice and pass any other or further order or orders which the learned Court may deem fit and proper.

And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.