CHAPTER TWO
Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining
The Distributive Bargaining
The Distributive Bargaining Situation
• Conflicting Goals
• Resources are fixed and limited
• Time is limited
• Relationship is not important
• Maximizing one’s own share of resources is the goal
• A conflict situation
Reasons behind using Distributive Bargaining
The Distributive Bargaining Situation
Preparation—set a
• Target point, aspiration point, optimal goal, preferred price
• Walk-away, bottom line, resistance point, reservation price
• Asking price, initial offer
The Distributive Bargaining Situation
The Distributive Bargaining
Situation
The Distributive Bargaining
Situation
The Distributive Bargaining
Situation
The Distributive Bargaining
Situation
The Distributive Bargaining
Situation
The Distributive Bargaining
Situation: Bargaining Range
The Role of Alternatives to a Negotiated Agreement
• Alternatives give the negotiator power to walk away from the negotiation: BATNA
– If alternatives are attractive, negotiators can:
• Set their goals higher
• Make fewer concessions
– If there are no attractive alternatives:
• Negotiators have much less bargaining power
The Role of Alternatives to a
Negotiated Agreement
The Role of Alternatives to a Negotiated Agreement
Settlement Points
Bargaining Mix
Fundamental Strategies
• Push for settlement near opponent’s resistance point
• Get the other party to change their resistance point
• If settlement range is negative, either:
– Get the other side to change their resistance point
– Modify your own resistance point
• Convince the other party that the settlement is the best possible
Keys to the Strategies
The keys to implementing any of the four strategies are:
•Discovering the other party’s resistance point
•Influencing the other party’s resistance point
Keys to the Strategies
Influencing The Other Party’s Resistance Point
Tactical Tasks of Negotiators
• Assess outcome values and the costs of termination for the other party
• Manage the other party’s impressions
• Modify the other party’s perceptions
• Manipulate the actual costs of delay or termination
Assess Outcome Values and the Costs of Termination for the Other Party
• Indirectly
– Determine information opponent used to set:
• Target
• Resistance points
• Directly
– Opponent reveals the information
• Time shortage
• Absolute limit
Manage the Other Party’s Impressions
Important Tactical Task- conceal and control information sent to other party.
• Screening activities are more important at the beginning of the negotiation, and direct action is more useful later on.
Manage the Other Party’s Impressions
• Screen your behavior:
– Say and do as little as possible
• Direct action to alter impressions
– Present facts that enhance one’s position
Direct action to Alter Impressions
Direct action to Alter Impressions
Modify the Other Party’s Perceptions
• Make outcomes appear less attractive
• Make the cost of obtaining goals appear higher
• Make demands and positions appear more or less attractive to the other party –whichever suits your needs
Modify the Other Party’s Perceptions
Manipulate the Actual Costs of
Delay or Termination
Negotiators have deadline. Extending negotiation beyond deadline can be costly.
Three ways to manipulate the costs of delay in negotiation:
•Plan disruptive action
•Form an alliance with outsiders
•Schedule manipulations
Manipulate the Actual Costs of
Delay or Termination
• Plan Disruptive Action
– Raise the costs of delay to the other party
Examples:
üPublic picketing of a business
üBoycotting a product
üBoycotting a company
üLocking negotiators in a room
These tactics can work but there are possibilities of producing anger, escalation of conflict
Manipulate the Actual Costs of
Delay or Termination
• Form an alliance with outsiders
– Involve (or threaten to involve) other parties who can influence the outcome in your favor
• Schedule manipulations
– Scheduling process can often put one party at a considerable disadvantage.
– Especially when one party is usually more vulnerable to delaying than the other
Manipulate the Actual Costs of
Delay or Termination
• Schedule manipulations: Examples-
– Negotiation are often scheduled to begin immediately after the journey
– The place of the negotiation is not comfortable
– Delay tactics could e used so that part could squeeze negotiation in the last remaining minutes of a session
– Industrial buyers-> short lead time-> idle sitting of the plants
– Just in time inventory users
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
• At the beginning of the negotiation each party takes a position.
• Changes in position will occur as new information concerning the other’s intention, the value of outcomes, concessions, and likely zone for settlement will come fore.
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
• Opening offer
– Where will you start?
ØToo low
ØToo High: Higher offer makers gets higher settlements
Advantages of Exaggerated offers:
1. Higher bargaining range, thus parties have more time to learn about each others intention
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
• Disadvantages of Exaggerated offers:
– instantly rejected by the other party
– Communicates an attitude of toughness
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
• Opening stance
– What is your attitude?
• Competitive? Moderate?
ØA reasonable bargaining position is usually coupled with a friendly stance
ØAn exaggerated bargaining position is usually coupled with a tougher more competitive stance
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
• Initial concessions
Concessions are central to Negotiation
– Should any be made? If so, how large?
ØAn opening offer is usually met with a counteroffer = Bargaining Range
ØGood distributive bargainers make sure that there is a large bargaining range while placing their opening offer.
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
• The role of concessions
– Without them, there is either capitulation or deadlock
• Patterns of concession making
– The pattern contains valuable information
– When successive concessions get smaller the obvious message is – the concession maker’s position is getting firmer and the resistance point is being approached
Positions Taken
During Negotiations
• Final offer (making a commitment)
– “This is all I can do”
Commitment
Commitments:
Tactical Considerations
Commitments:
Tactical Considerations
Commitments:
Tactical Considerations
Closing the Deal
Typical Hardball Tactics
Typical Hardball Tactics
Typical Hardball Tactics
Typical Hardball Tactics
Dealing with Typical
Hardball Tactics
Summary
Summary