Acid Aparadh Daman Ain, 2002

 

 

Acid Aparadh Daman Ain, 2002

Section-5(Ka)

In view of the injuries found on the person of the victim by the Medical Experts and also by the Tribunal Judge himself at the time of examination of the victim as PW2, and upon consideration of the provisions of law that if somebody by] throwing acid causes injuries on some other person damages eyesight or hearing partly or completely or deface or damages breast or sex organs shall be punished under Section 5(Ka) of the said Ain, and since the Medical Experts found the victim's eyesight and hearing organs have been damaged and his chest and the lower body organs are also damaged by acid, we have no doubt that the instant case comes within the preview of Section 5(Ka) of the Ain.

Md. Alamgir Vs The State 13 BLT (HCD) 304

Section 5(Ka) (Kha)

Belated disclosure of material facts

It is well settled that when an eye witness to the occurrence that took place at night does not disclose the names of the assailants he allegedly recognized, the means of recognition and other material facts to the witnesses who came to the scene immediately after the occurrence was over t the earliest opportunity and there is no justifiable reason for non disclosure of the al facts, belated disclosure of the al facts render his evidence/testimony ill. In such a case Court should reasonably infer that the story of recognition the assailants was a subsequent embellishment.

Abdul Haq & Ors Vs. The State 14 BLT (HCD) 476

Section 5(Ka) (Kha)

Admittedly the occurrence took place at t BLT there was no clear evidence about means of recognition although P.W.2 testified that in her room there was a 'cane and P.W.  1  testified that he recognized the accused by torch light BLT the was not produced to the investigation r or he took any step for seizing the hurricane and torch light as means of ignition.  In  a case  like  this when occurrence took place at night the question recognition is  vital importance. In absence of any evidence or means of ignition the identity of the accused is not established beyond reasonable doubt. So in case it is unsafe to convict accused.

Abdul Haq & Ors Vs. The State 14 BLT (HCD) 476

Section -11(3)

Period of investigation or further investigation

The Tribunal by such provision is not empowered to increase or enlarge statutory schedule of time fixed, by the legislature beyond extended time, for the purpose of investigation or further investigation.

Mokbul Hosen & Ors. Vs The State 13 BLT (HCD) 564

Section -20

The Tribunal has no locus standi to withdraw earlier Order for further investigation by C.I.D. and decided to hold Judicial enquiry by itself.

Section 22 provides that provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure is. applicable in the matter of institution, investigation and trial of any case and the Tribunal constituted under the Acid Domon Ain is a Sessions Judge and will exercise all the power of Sessions Judge in trial of the offence under the Ain and accordingly Tribunal decided to hold a judicial inquiry as prayed for Sessions Judge into acid offence alleged in the F.I.R. and in doing so Tribunal is not required to withdraw or recall its earlier order dated 17.8.2004 for further investigation inasmuch as additional tenure of time not exceeding fifteen days to complete further investigation as mandated under Sub-section (3) expired on 1.9.2004 and, therefore, lost its force automatically.

Mokbul Hosen & Ors. Vs The State 13 BLT (HCD) 564

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.