Bangladesh Service Rules

 

Bangladesh
Service Rules

 

Rule—24(1)

Under
Rule 24(1) of Bangladesh Service Rules Government Servant may be transferred
from one post to another. This is a term and conditions of service of a
Government servant If Class III and Class IV employees have been exempted from
operation of Rule 24(1) then it is an improvement in their general condition of
service. If any authority violates the said improved condition of service and
transfers a Class III or Class IV employee from one station to another then it
is a clean violation of the general conditions of service of that employee.

Government
of Bangladesh and ors., Vs Mohammad Faruque, 18 BLD (AD) 277.

 

RuIe—72,
Note 4

The
period of absence of Government servant on reinstatement in service after
wrongful retirement shall be treated as a period spent on duty and he will be
entitled to pay allowances and as admissible under clause (a) of the Rule.
Clause (a) of Rule 72 speaks that in case of honourable acquittal the incumbent
is entitled to full pay to which he would have been entitled if he had not been
dismissed or removed or suspended. The Administrate Appellate Tribunal rightly
held that the respondent is entitled to the arrear pay and allowances.

Secretary,
Ministry of Establishment Vs A .M Nurunnabi 21 BLD (AD) 41.

 

Bangladesh Service Rules

 

 

Bangladesh Service Rule

Rule 5(57)-

"Traveling allowance"-It varies upon the circumstances of each journey undertaken by an employee.

Government of People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Labour and Manpower, Bangladesh Secretariat Dhaka vs Hasan Movies Ltd and others 48 DLR (AD) 40.

Rule 21-

A vested right was created in favour of the petitioner to the post of Director General of Bangladesh Shilpakala Academy and such a right cannot be taken away by cancelling his contractual service as Principal of Music College as he joined the College keeping his lien to his service as the Director General. Since his lien was kept intact and it was never cancelled, he ought to have been allowed to join his former post as Director General of Bangladesh Shilpakala Academy.

Azad Rahman vs Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others 49 DLR 298.

Rule 24(1)-

lf Class III and Class IV employees have been exempted from operation of rule 24(1) then it is an improvement in their general condition of service. If any authority violates this improved condition of service then it is a clear violation of the general conditions of service of that employee.

Government of Bangladesh and Ors vs Mohammad Faruque 51 DLR (AD) 112.

Rule 72(b)-

The review forum having found the respondent honourably acquitted the Tribunals below rightly held that the respondent is entitled to the arrear pay and allowances.

Secretary, Ministry bf Establishment vs AM Nurunnabi 53 DLR (AD) 41.

Bangladesh Service Rules, 1983

Rule 342(2)-

Duty to pay pensions to a person who has worked for the stipulated period of time remains an undischaged contractual obligation-Where the employee retires or is terminated there must exist provision for payment of pension, describing the mode and timing of payment of pension to terminated employees, else courts will imply terms to that effect.

MA Jalil vs Rupali Bank Ltd and others 54 DLR 566.

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.