Extradition Act, 1974

 

Extradition
Act [LVIII of 1974]


Section 4–

The
government has sufficient legal authority to extradite Anup Chetia to India in
response to the right of India to demand extradition of Anup Chetia.

Saiful Islam
Dilder vs Government of Bangladesh and others 50 DLR 318.

 

Section 6–

A ‘fugitive
offender can be extradited from Bangladesh to the United Kingdom in the manner
as stated in section 6 of the Act.

Abdul Abedin
Abdul vs State 53 DLR 109.

 

Sections 6 & 12–

In
considering the prayer for bail of a fugitive offender arrested or detained
under the Extradition Act, provision of section 497 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure shall have to be considered.

Abdul Abedin
Abdul vs State 53 DLR 109.

 

Extradition Act, 1974

 

Extradition
Act, 1974 (Lviii Of 1974)

 

Section—4

Special
Powers Act, 1974, Section—3(i ) and 2(t)(ii)

In
a case where a citizen of a foreign country intends to stay in Bangladesh and
if the Government is satisfied that the extradition of such person is called
for in order to maintain friendly relations of Bangladesh with foreign States
the Government can on the strength of section 3(i) and section 2(f)(ii) of the
Special Powers Act extradite such citizen to his own country in absence of any
extradition treaty between the Government of Bangladesh and such foreign
States. The Government of Bangladesh has sufficient legal authority to
extradite Anup Chetia to India in response to the right of India to demand
extradition of Anup Chetia.

Saiful islam
Dilder Vs Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 18 BLD (HCD) 615.

Ref:
Ramos Vs. Diuz, 1498; M. Saleemullah Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 47 DLR 218—Cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.