JANATA BANK SERVICE RULE

Rule-16(1) and B.S.R. Part-1
Rule-389

The Rules of the Janata Bank only provide for certain benefits as are admissible to a Government servant. But Rule 389 B.S.R. Part-1 has no legal application to Janata Bank employees.

Janata Bank Vs. Md. Shahalam Sarker 5BLT (AD)-211

Janata Bank Employees Service Regulations 1981 

Requirement—to record reasons

“When the review authority does not differ from the findings in the enquiry report or reports, it does not need give any independent reasonings of its own. It is only when the concerned authority differs, it has to give some reasonings which may not be elaborate.

Janata Bank & Ors. Vs Khandker Faruq Mahmood & Ors. 7BLT (AD)-293

Regulation-28

Competent authority—the proceeding was instituted, the appointment of the Inquiry Officer was made, the charge sheet was framed, the inquiry was concluded and the second show cause notice was served all by and at the instance of the General Manager (Administration), while the order of dismissal was passed by the Board. The Assistant General Manager (Administration) only communicated and served notices etc.—the proceeding in question was held and the order of dismissal was passed by the competent authority.

Janata Bank Vs. Md. Mofazzal Hossain & Ors. 6BLT (AD)-241

Regulation No. 29(1)

Principles of Natural Justice At any rate, there was no obligation upon the review authority to accept the second enquiry report which was redundant—That apart, the second enquiry report has not vested respondent No. 1 with any legal right and such a report was not binding on the review authority either.

Janata Bank & Ors. Vs. Khandker Faruq Mahmood & Ors. 7 BLT (AD)-293.

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.