Mongla Port Authority Regulations, 1991

 

Mongla Port
Authority Regulations, 1991

 

Regulations
41(2) & 43(2)–

Composition
of the inquiry committee depends on. the nature of the allegation. If the
enquiry committee is to proceed against an employee alleged of disruptive
activities then regulation 41(2) will apply and in that case the enquiry
committee is to be composed of three members. In case the allegation is in the
nature of major offence the enquiry committee under regulation 43(2)(GA) will
consist of two members.

Atiqur
Rahman vs. Chairman, Mongla Port Authority and another 49 DLR 636.

 

Regulation
43(6), (7) and (8)–

Unlike sub­-regulation
(8) sub-regulations (6) and (7) of Regulation 43 are not backed by consequence.
Therefore sub-regulations (6) and (7) are more directory and not mandatory and
the authority is not bound to give final decision within 15 days from the date
of expiry of seven days given by show cause notice. But the time limit of 180
days for giving final decision by the authority, as provided in sub-regulation
8, is binding on the authority, as it is backed by consequence and any failure
on its part will absolve the accused employee.

Atiqur
Rahman vs. Chairman, Mongla Port Authority and another 49 DLR 636.

 

Regulation
48–

Regulation
48 gives a concurrent jurisdiction to the Chairman and the Board on review
petition. Therefore there is no violation of the regulation for disposal of the
review petition by the Chairman alone.

Atiqur
Rahman vs Chairman, Mongla Port Authority and another 49 DLR 636.

 

Disclaimer:

The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist.  The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.