Legal Opinion on Regarding Mortgaged Properties, A/C. M/S Company 1.

Mr. Z

Address….

Dear Sir,

RE:      LEGAL OPINION ON REGARDING MORTGAGED PROPERTIES, A/C. M/S Company 1.

Please refer to your letter dated 17.05.2007 (received on 22.05.2007) on the above subject.

We understood that the Bank 1 (the “BANK 1”) came to know from the reliable sources that the mortgaged property mentioned in the Sl. (ii) of the Schedule “B” of the Artha Rin Suit No. 02 of 2007 is also lying mortgage with the Bank 2 (the “Bank 2”) against credit facilities availed by the captioned borrower. Upon perusal of your letter it is clear that at first, the property in question was mortgaged with BANK 1 and the same was mortgaged with the Bank 2 for the second time. In such situation we are requested to provide our opinion on the same as to protect the interest of BANK 1.

Our opinion is as follows:

BANK 1 has already filed Artha Rin Suit No. 2 of 2007 in the Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court, Dhaka against the borrower and mortgagor/guarantor(s) for recovery of its outstanding dues by sale of the mortgaged properties. Since the BANK 1 is the prior mortgagee and the Bank 2 is subsequent mortgagee therefore BANK 1 has 1st charge over the said property and the BANK 1 is legally entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount from the sale proceeds of the mortgaged property. In such situation best possible course of action would be for BANK 1 to proceed with the Artha Rin Suit as usual.

If you have any further query, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,

………………….

For: “The Lawyers & Jurists”